Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Clifton Holding, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In its decision County Court declared that the second appraisal at issue in this case was but a “backup appraisal” used by the Federal Government merely to establish a maximum acquisition price in the negotiations to purchase defendant’s property. Having so found, the court noted that “ in this jurisdiction it is well settled that appraisals used solely for the purpose of establishing a recommended price are not discoverable nor admissible in evidence ”, citing Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead (58 Misc 2d 648,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- In re the Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fassett v. FassettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Erie Lackawanna Railway Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Cronk v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- Backer v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- George v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.