Legal Opinion

United States v. Tito Juan Pino-Perez

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 10, 1989No. 88-1507PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

We decided to hear this case en banc, pursuant to Circuit Rule 40(f), in order to decide whether violation of the federal “kingpin” statute, 21 U.S.C. § 848 (Continuing Criminal Enterprises, Title II, § 408, of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970), is “an offense against the United States” within the meaning of the federal aider and abettor statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2(a). That statute provides: “Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.” A panel of this court…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Guy Giovannetti and Nicholas JanisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. John Doe and Other Members of the Football Team at Illinois State University v. Gte Corporation and Genuity Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Esmark, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API