Legal Opinion

Estate of Slaughter v. City of Hampton

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 2008No. CA 07-1328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L.Griffen, Judge.

Previously, the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) found that Jerry Slaughter did not suffer a compensable injury in the form of a chemical exposure that led to his death. We reversed and remanded that case. On remand, the Commission awarded appropriate death benefits pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-527 (Repl. 2002), except for widow’s benefits. It denied widow’s benefits to La’Ronda Slaughter, Mr. Slaughter’s widow, because she was not married to him when he suffered the chemical exposure. Mr. Slaughter’s estate again appeals, arguing that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Rockefeller v. RockefellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Fayetteville School District v. KunzelmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Orsburn v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  5. Hoskins v. Rogers Cold StorageCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Death & Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Landers v. Arkansas Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Mohammed v. Maverick TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API