Fayetteville School District v. Kunzelman
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David M. Glover, Judge.
This is a workers’ compensation udge. affirmed and adopted the ALJ’s decision, which found that appellee, James Kunzelman, sustained a compensable right-eye injury on January 7, 2003, and that he was entitled to additional medical treatment for his right eye, reimbursement for sunglasses, and $3000 for permanent facial disfigurement. For their sole point of appeal, appellants, Fayetteville School District and Risk Management Resources, contend that the Commission’s opinion is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm the Commission.
Standard of Review
When…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stone v. Dollar General StoresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Swaim v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Hargis Transport v. ChesserCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Jolly v. J. M. Hampton & Sons Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
3Cited by13 opinions
- Roberts v. WhirlpoolCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Bohannon v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- St. Joseph's Mercy Medical Center v. RedmondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Wayne Smith Trucking, Inc. v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
- Mooney v. AT & TCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.