Legal Opinion

Fayetteville School District v. Kunzelman

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 2005No. CA 05-479PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David M. Glover, Judge.

This is a workers’ compensation udge. affirmed and adopted the ALJ’s decision, which found that appellee, James Kunzelman, sustained a compensable right-eye injury on January 7, 2003, and that he was entitled to additional medical treatment for his right eye, reimbursement for sunglasses, and $3000 for permanent facial disfigurement. For their sole point of appeal, appellants, Fayetteville School District and Risk Management Resources, contend that the Commission’s opinion is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm the Commission.

Standard of Review

When…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. Dollar General StoresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Swaim v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Hargis Transport v. ChesserCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Jolly v. J. M. Hampton & Sons Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WhirlpoolCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Bohannon v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. St. Joseph's Mercy Medical Center v. RedmondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Wayne Smith Trucking, Inc. v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Mooney v. AT & TCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API