Legal Opinion

Orsburn v. Graves

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 14, 1948No. 4-8534PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grieein Smith, Chief Justice.

If appellee is the widow of William Graves, then admittedly she is entitled to an award denied by Workmen’s Compensation Commission; and Associated Indemnity Corporation, as carrier of the risk, must pay. The Commission, in its consideration of facts, found that the relationship of husband and wife did not exist, and then held, as a matter of law, that Act 319 of 1939 did not apply, the term “widow” having been limited” ... to the decedent’s wife living with or dependent for support upon [the employe] at the time of his death.” Circuit Court reversed and ordered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lathan v. LathanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Goset v. GosetSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Edelstein v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bruno v. BrunoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Bickford v. CardenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Estate of Slaughter v. City of HamptonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  5. Bruno v. BrunoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API