Lombardo v. Pollock
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
A superior court order distributing the proceeds of a wrongful death settlement is the subject of this special action. We are of the opinion that, despite the existence of a remedy by appeal, our obligation “to see that essential justice is done” warrants intervention by way of special action. See Caruso v. Superior Court, 100 Ariz. 167, 412 P.2d 463 (1966).
The undisputed facts are as follows. Petitioner is the surviving spouse of Lawrence Lombardo who died on February 19, 1969. Lawrence D. Lombardo, a minor, is the only surviving child. Decedent was a resident of and was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Salinas v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- General Petroleum Corp. of Cal. v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of Estate of BruckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Guy v. JohnsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Keithley v. KeithleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- State v. StandsberryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.