Legal Opinion

Wade v. Arizona State Retirement System

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 31, 2016No. 1 CA-CV 14-0721PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge:

¶ 1 A.R.S. § 38-711(7) defines the “compensation” on which employee and employer contributions to the Arizona State Retirement System (“Retirement System” or “ASRS”) are calculated. The Retirement System interprets that statute to exclude from “compensation” the City of Chandler’s payment of contributions to an eligible deferred compensation plan, and the superior court upheld that interpretation. We disagree. We hold that § 38-711(7) defines “compensation” to include money paid by an employer to a deferred compensation plan, even if the employee could not elect to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dressler v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mary wade/marla Paddock v. asrs/asrs BoardArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Green Cross Medical, Inc. v. GallyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API