Legal Opinion

Proskurnja v. Elder

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 15, 1962PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

73 N.J. Super. 466 (1962)

180 A.2d 200

ALEXANDRIA PROSKURNJA AND ALEXANDER PROSKURNJA, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ARTHUR ELDER, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided March 15, 1962.

Mr. John Romanition argued the cause for plaintiffs.

Mr. Cornelius W. Caruso argued the cause for defendant.

MATTHEWS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This matter comes before me on the application of plaintiffs, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-69, for payment by the Unsatisfied Judgment Fund of a judgment heretofore obtained by plaintiffs before this court and a jury. Counsel for the Fund opposes the application…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sattelberger v. TelepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Dixon v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Corrigan v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Wormack v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shaw v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Bowser v. JacobsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Feliciano v. OglesbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. WallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. Shaw v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API