Legal Opinion

Kroshus v. Koury

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 31, 1981No. 8754-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

— Robert M. Kroshus appeals a summary judgment dismissing his personal injury claim against Texaco, Inc. We conclude that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that Texaco is entitled to a judgment of dismissal as a matter of law. We therefore affirm the trial court.

On October 28, 1977, Mary A. Koury was driving a 1973 Cadillac owned by a person not a party to this action when she collided with a 1969 Volkswagen driven by Robert M. Kroshus. At the time of the accident, Ms. Koury was on her way to make a bank deposit into her husband's Texaco business checking account, an account used…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hollingbery v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kuehn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. McLean v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Omni Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Charlton v. Day Island Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Chicago Title Insurance v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Chi. Title Ins. Co. v. Office of Ins. Comm'rWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Chicago Title Insurance v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerWashington Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API