Legal Opinion

Chi. Title Ins. Co. v. Office of Ins. Comm'r

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2013No. 87215-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion"was filed for ree~rd' Fl L E at $~o'D Qm on A~..:S l, 2.0t3 '\hfi~ Rapeme \ Ronald ~upreme Court Clerk EME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, an ) Authorized Insurer, ) ) No. 87215-5 Respondent, ) ) En Bane v. ) ) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF THE ) Fi1 ---fJA~-V-~.UGt~--V-0-!--18::20Hil13e-_- - ed INSURANCE COMMISSIONER, ) ) Petitioner. ) ) WIGGINS, J.- Washington State strictly regulates how insurance may be provided and marketed in order to protect the consumer. Applicable statutes and regulations prohibit an insurer or its agent from giving out…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. King v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Wash. Emp. SEC. Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API