Legal Opinion
People v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 2000No. A087299PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRAMDER, J. *
Defendant Troy Smith appeals an order granting a motion by the City and County of San Francisco (County), on behalf of the People of the State of California, for reimbursement of legal services rendered to him (Pen. Code, 1 § 987.8). He contends he was not given notice required under section 987.8, subdivision (f), that he may be subject to such reimbursement, and the trial court erred in ordering the County, to collect the amount of reimbursement from funds seized from him upon his arrest and held by the court. We affirm the order of the trial court.
Background
Between 1990…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. AmorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. VerduzcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Schaffer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. MowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. Martinez CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021