Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 14, 2003No. 5D02-2406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTorpy, J.

This is an ad valorem taxation dispute between the Citrus County Property Appraiser and other taxing authorities (hereinafter collectively “Appellant”) and Appel-lee, owner of a cable television franchise, involving the propriety of the assessment of portions of Appellee’s cable system. After trial without a jury, the lower court entered judgment resolving the disputed issues in Appellee’s favor. Appellant raises one issue on appeal, whether the court erred when it determined that “exterior cable drops” are not “tangible personal property” and thus not taxable. Because we conclude that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Cablevision of Michigan, Inc v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. T-V Transmission, Inc. v. County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Comcast Cablevision of Sterling Heights, Inc v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Bylund v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1981
  5. Cox Cable of Cedar Rapids, Inc. v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schultz v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API