Legal Opinion

Comcast Cablevision of Sterling Heights, Inc v. City of Sterling Heights

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1996No. Docket 177513PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.

The City of Sterling Heights appeals as of right from an assessment revision rendered in favor of Comcast Cablevision of Sterling Heights, Inc., by the Michigan Tax Tribunal. We affirm.

This case stems from a dispute regarding the tax treatment of the value of cable “house drops” installed by Comcast to connect its cable television subscribers to the Comcast cable system. The parties are largely in agreement regarding the relevant facts, which were stipulated below. Under the stipulation, a “house drop” is defined as follows:

The cable which extends from a tap in a feeder cable, into the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rasheed v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Meadowlanes Ltd. Dividend Housing Ass'n v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Continental Cablevision of Michigan, Inc v. City of RosevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re LooseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rose Hill Center, Inc v. Holly TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, Inc v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Schultz v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Coxcom, Inc. v. Picerne Real Estate Group, 02-1537 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API