Legal Opinion

Patton v. Endowment Department of A. F. A. M.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1936No. 3 Div. 164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Suit by appellant to recover an amount alleged to be due her by appellee under an insurance contract, in which it is alleged the appellant was the beneficiary.

The defendant pleaded in short by consent “with leave to give in evidence any thing which might be specially pleaded.” This pleading on the part of defendant was in writing, and was signed by counsel for defendant.

The case was tried by the court without a jury.

The bill of exceptions, immediately following the first paragraph, contains this statement: “Note: Plead in short by consent with leave to give in evidence any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Taylor v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Faught v. LeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. ReddAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Folmar Mercantile Co. v. Town of LuverneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gipson v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Hendrix v. PiqueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Compton v. ComptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. John E. Ballenger Const. Co. v. Joe F. Walters Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API