Legal Opinion

John E. Ballenger Const. Co. v. Joe F. Walters Const. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 27, 1938No. 4 Div. 992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The Court of Appeals very properly refused to consider matter not shown by the record when they interpreted the bill- of exceptions. Pearce v. Clements, 73 Ala. 256.

The point on which that court based its opinion depended upon a construction of that instrument. When so, on certiorari to this court, we will examine the record for a complete understanding of the status under consideration. Cranford v. National Surety Corp., 231 Ala. 636, 166 So. 721.

The suit was for certain alleged items of labor, material, feedstuff, and supplies sold to a road contractor, and counted on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cranford v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Pearce v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Anniston Mfg. Co. v. So. R'y Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Patton v. Endowment Department of A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sparks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Esdale v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Glenn v. BlackmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API