Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gelormo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1984No. 413 and 743PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Herbert Thomas and Arthur Gelormo were tried jointly on charges arising from a robbery on April 21, 1979 at the residence of Richard Tarus in Upper Providence Township, Montgomery County. The jury which heard the evidence found Gelormo guilty of robbery, burglary, theft, recklessly endangering another person, terroristic threats and conspiracy. The same jury found Thomas guilty of criminal conspiracy. Post-verdict motions were denied, and sentences of imprisonment were imposed. Separate appeals were filed and consolidated for argument. We will consider the following arguments…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Quinones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. United States Ex Rel. Smith v. BaldiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. State v. KnappArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. VandivnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API