Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. Di Giorgio Fruit Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 7, 1943No. 22090PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

This is an action for overtime payment and an equal amount as liquidated damages brought under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216 ■(b), by the plaintiff on behalf of himself and all other employees similarly situated. It is not questioned that the defendant, which operates a winery, produces goods for interstate commerce and is therefore subject to the Act. The only question is the applicability of the exemptions provided therein by Section 7(b) (3) and (c), 29 U.S.C.A. § 207(b) (3), (c). 1

From the stipulated facts it appears that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Swift & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
  2. Walling v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. Heaburg v. Independent Oil Mill, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1942

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1956
  2. Wyatt v. Holtville Alfalfa Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1952
  3. Colbeck v. Dairyland Creamery Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Walling v. California Conserving Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API