Legal Opinion

Gilmore Ex Rel. Gilmore v. Grand Prix of Tulsa Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1963No. 40117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Chief Justice.

This appeal arose out of a garnishment proceeding instituted by plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as “garnishors”, against the insurance company appearing here as defendant in error, henceforth referred to as “garnishee”, after said garnish-ors had recovered judgment on March 11, 1961,, against the Grand Prix of Tulsa Corporation, in a total sum of $5605.60, on account of personal injuries sustained on June 17, 1960, by the minor, Doulgas Gilmore, at a “go-cart” track, operated by the latter corporation, to which we will hereinafter refer as: “Grand Prix”.

Th…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Ampy v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. Skipper v. Federal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  4. Crescent Ring Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  5. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. of Dallas v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laxton v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ronald K. Richardson v. Geneva Brown, Allstate Insurance Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Sorenson v. Hartford Accident & Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Scott v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API