Sorenson v. Hartford Accident & Life Insurance Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from a Summary Judgment in favor of Hartford in a group insurance policy case, holding that the policy speaks for itself and is dispositive when it specifically says that upon termination of employment, the policy is no longer in force.
Sorenson’s employment ended July 3rd, he was injured on a motorcycle on the 5th. The premium for July was paid. The policy had a conversion clause providing for lesser amounts for a lesser premium and Sorenson took advantage of the option. He was paid under the new policy for expenses, etc. Nonetheless he claims benefits…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gilmore Ex Rel. Gilmore v. Grand Prix of Tulsa Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Finstad v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Larson v. Wycoff Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
- The American Casualty Company Of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994