Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1931No. Docket No. 4415PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff had judgment in the sum of $4,250 for and on account of damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of coming in contact with a high-powered electric transmission line, negligently maintained by the defendant. From this judgment the defendant appeals, and also from an order denying defendant's motion for judgment in its favor, notwithstanding the verdict.

The complaint alleges that on the third day of May, 1929, the defendant was maintaining a power transmission line suspended on poles, in and over the Cutten-McDonald tract, near or adjacent to the city of Eureka; that the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Benton v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Stedwell v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Biggs v. Consolidated Barb-Wire Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Garcia v. SoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Lopez v. Capitol Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Compton Ex Rel. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hopper v. BulaichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API