Union Central Life Insurance v. Bullard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, 0. J.
It will be observed that there is an apparent conflict between what appears in the judgment and the case on appeal. Where such conflict exists, the recitals appearing in the record proper are controlling. Bartholomew v. Parrish, 190 N. C., 151, 129 S. E., 190; Moore v. Moore, 185 N. C., 332, 117 S. E., 12; S. v. Wheeler, 185 N. C., 670, 116 S. E., 413. “Where there is a repugnancy between the record and the case stated, the record will control.” S. v. Keeter, 80 N. C., 472.
But for another reason the appeal must be dismissed. It is agreed “that the affidavits, summons, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . KeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Moore v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Waters v. . WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Cole v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- State v. . McKeonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.