International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUTLEDGE, Associate Justice.
The Serrick Corporation, of Ohio, has a plant in Muncie, Indiana, in which it manufactures bolts and screws, automobile moldings, refrigerator parts, and stenotype machines. It is engaged in interstate commerce and has an annual pay roll in excess of one million dollars. Its relations with three labor organizations, which we designate as indicated below,1 are in question here. I.A.M. has appealed from findings and an order of the National Labor Relations Board (8 N.L.R.B. 621). The findings were to the effect that the employer had engaged in unfair labor practices…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Motor Bearing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Trans World Accounts, Inc., a California Corporation, and Floyd T. Watkins v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.