Legal Opinion

Haglund v. Philip Morris Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 2006PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

We determine in this case whether a cigarette manufacturer in a wrongful death action predicated on breach of the warranty of merchantability may assert as an affirmative defense that the decedent smoker’s use of cigarettes was “unreasonable.” See Correia v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., 388 Mass. 342, 356 (1983) (in warranty liability action, “the user’s negligence does not prevent recovery except when he unreasonably uses a product that he knows to be defective and dangerous”) (Correia defense).2

Following the death from lung cancer of her husband, Stephen C. Haglund (decedent), a long-time…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Correia v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Rule v. Fort Dodge Animal Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. Town of Westport v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. Evans v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  4. Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API