Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Maus

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1929No. Appeal, 142PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an action of trespass in the nature of trover and conversion brought to recover the value of merchandise belonging to plaintiffs, Avhich it is alleged de fendants sold, and converted the proceeds therefrom to the nse of the Wearever Knitting Mills, a corporation in which they were all directors. A nonsuit was entered in the court below and from the refusal to take it oft plaintiffs appeal.

Appellants purchased hosiery from the Wearever Knitting Mills which it had manufactured valued, so they claimed, at $5,186.15 and paid the corporation therefor. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Fanning v. . OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Murphy v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Davenport v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
  5. Fell v. PittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Shonberger v. OswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. CatinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Newman v. Forward Lands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API