Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Dominguez

California Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 14160PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Proceeding in mandate by petition of an elector to compel respondent city clerk to omit from the official ballot to be used at the primary election to be held in Los Angeles on May 2, 1933, the name of Emory J. Arnold for the office of councilman of the Tenth Council-manic District of the city of Los Angeles. The petition, demurrer and answer thereto, present but a single question and that is the qualification of Arnold for said office under the Los Angeles city charter. Section 307 of the charter provides:

“ No person shall be eligible to nomination or election to any office under this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Withers v. KerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gibson v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Johnson v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Thompson v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Wenke v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Smith v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API