Legal Opinion

Smith v. Evans

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1974No. Civ. 14015PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, J.

This appeal involves the constitutionality of a city charter provision establishing a one-year residence requirement for city council candidates.

The petitioners, Susan Smith and Tom Lundy, commenced a superior court mandate proceeding against the Chico City Clerk. Both alleged that they had requested nomination papers to qualify as city council candidates at the municipal election to be held April 3, 1973. The clerk had refused their requests because they could not fulfill the city charter’s demand for one year’s residence preceding January 25, 1973, the closing date for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Cawdrey v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. De Bottari v. MelendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Brewster v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API