People ex rel. Simmons v. Township of Munising
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alger; Fead (Louis H.), J. Quo warranto proceedings by the people of the State of Michigan, on the relation of David E. Simmons, prosecuting attorney of Alger county, against the township of Munising to determine the legality of an election. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this case an information in the
nature of a quo warranto was filed in the circuit court for the county of Alger by the prosecuting attorney, under the provisions of section 28 of chapter 38 of the judicature act (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 13551) to determine the legality of an election held in the township of Munising on May 18, 1920, under the direction of the township board, at which election there was submitted the following question:. “Shall the township school district of Munising township be disbanded and the township' re-districted into separate school districts?”
The said election was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MacQueen v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Board of Education v. BaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Oakland County Treasurer v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. WigginsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- General Motors Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.