Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1948No. Docket No. 45, Calendar No. 44,050PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This case involves the right of defendant and appellant, Ahira H. Rose, Jr., to unemployment compensation. For many years he was in the employ of plaintiff, General Motors Corporation, as a die sinker. Due to a UAW-CIO strike in November, 1945, Rose and some 40 or 50 other die sinkers were temporarily out of employment. Later Rose applied for unemployment compensation for the period during which he was out of work. At hearings before the unemployment compensation commission, the referee, and the appeal board, it was held that Rose was entitled to compensation. On certiorari to the circuit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Simmons v. Township of MunisingMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Franges v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Minty v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bofysil v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Tracer v. BushreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Wheeler v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API