Legal Opinion

In Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1979No. 6830PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Minor-appellant John Doe (hereinafter “Doe”) appeals from an order waiving Family Court jurisdiction and transferring him to Circuit Court for trial as an adult. Recently, we have seen a spate of cases questioning, among other issues, the adequacy of the Family Court’s waiver order. In re John Doe, 61 Haw. 167, 598 P.2d 176 (1979); In re John Doe, 61 Haw. 48, 594 P.2d 1084 (1979); State v. Stanley0527, 592 P.2d 422 (1979). Our concern in this case, however, is whether, on the merits, Doe should have been waived to Circuit Court. Doe argues that the Family Court abused its discretion in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In re F. S.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. StanleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. TominagaHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RauchHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. SandersHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API