Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Fuller

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 4, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.

This is a real action under M.R.C.P. Rule 80A. The Court sitting without a jury ordered judgment entered for the plaintiff for title in fee simple and possession of the demanded premises and also for $1.00 with costs. The defendant appeals.

The controversy centers about the dividing line bewteen two lakeshore lots, namely, the plaintiff’s lot on the north known as the “Community Lot” and the defendant’s lot on the south known as the Bates or Fuller lot. The lots are bounded on the west by the lake and on the east by a straight road running north and south known in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ames v. HiltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  2. Bryant v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  3. Heaton v. HodgesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1836
  4. Hardison v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  5. Hardison v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Rusha v. LittleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Perkins v. ConarySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Conary v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API