Legal Opinion
Manosky v. Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyard, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 9, 1949No. 4424PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Chief Judge.
On this appeal, the main question is as to the sufficiency of a complaint under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.; specifically whether, in order to come within the limiting provisions of § 2 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 84, 29 U.S.C.A. § 252, it was enough to allege in general terms, in the language of the Act, that the activities for which overtime compensation was claimed were compensable by express provision of a written or nonwritten contract, or by a prevailing custom or practice not inconsistent with…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Doucette v. VincentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Antonio Copra v. Jose A. SuroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- American Federation of Labor v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.