Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Faust
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1915No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error to Genesee; Wisner, J. Assumpsit by Thomas Doyle and another against Joseph Faust and others for work, labor, and materials. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
The Faust-Scheel Company, a copartnership, contracted with plaintiffs to construct for them, furnishing all material and labor, a certain building for $9.-945—
“subject to additions and deductions as provided in the general conditions of the specifications and that such sum shall be paid by the owner to the contractor, in current funds, and only upon certificates of the architect, as follows:
“Ninety per cent, of the value of the. completed work, upon estimates made by the architects, every two weeks as the work progresses until it is entirely completed.
“The final payment including the ten per…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- People's Lumber Co. v. GillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Village of Chester v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of South NorfolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Ramada Development Company, a Corporation v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- The Winston Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. John R. Thompson Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.