Legal Opinion

Rednall v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1952No. Civ. 7987PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant James Robert Thompson in an action arising out of an automobile collision, and from the order denying plaintiffs' motion for a new trial.

The testimony, viewed in the light most favorable to respondents shows that plaintiffs, while driving north on the Feather River Boulevard at a point a few miles south of the city of Marysville, struck the rear of respondent Thompson’s jeep. Thompson also had been driving north and had stopped because of ignition trouble which resulted in the ■failure of the lights on his car. From then until the time…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Soda v. MarriottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Luis v. CavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Burbank v. McIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ando v.WoodberryNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Gist v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Bates v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Powell v. BartmessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Ungefug v. D'AMBROSIACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API