Legal Opinion

Lammert v. Dalkon Shield Trust

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 16, 1997No. 85-01307-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of Daikon Shield Claimant Robert A. Lammert (“Mr. Lammert”) to set aside his alternative dispute resolution decision.1 The *541Daikon Shield Claimants Trust (the “Trust”) opposes Mr. Lammert’s motion. On September 10, 1997, the Court took evidence and heard argument on the motion. For the reasons which follow, the Court will DENY Mr. Lammert’s motion.

I

Mr. Lammert is a non-user Daikon Shield claimant who claims that he has suffered injuries as a result of his wife’s (“Mrs. Lammert”) use of the Daikon Shield IUD.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walter Gordon v. William D. Leeke, Commissioner Joe Martin, Warden, Wayne Stephen Young v. George H. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  2. Leeke v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. J. Ferber Coleman v. Courtland C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  4. Bledsoe v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  5. In Re A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor. Cheslene Bledsoe Barbara Raygor, Claimants-Appellants v. Dalkon Shield Trust, Trust-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maksimuk v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API