Legal Opinion

Maksimuk v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided July 31, 1998No. 85-01307-RPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SPENCER, District Judge; BLACKWELL N. SHELLY, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Second Motion to Vacate Arbitration Decision filed by Daikon Shield Claimant Joyce A. Maksimuk (Docket No. 30323). For the reasons which follow, the Court will DENY the motion.

I

Joyce A. Maksimuk (“Ms.Maksimuk”) chose to pursue her claim under Option 3 of the Claims Resolution Facility (“CRF”). After rejecting the Daikon Shield Claimants Trust’s (“the Trust”) offers of compensation to her, she elected to resolve her claim in arbitration under CRF § E.5(a). To enter arbitration, Ms.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Remmey v. Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  2. O'Connor v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  3. Briggs v. Dalkon Shield TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. Dalkon Shield Trust v. Fields (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  5. Short v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ladner v. Daikon Shield Trust (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  2. Widmark v. Dalkon Shield Trust (In Re A.H. Robins Co.)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API