Legal Opinion

Smithson v. Sparber

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1932No. Docket No. 7753PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal was taken from a judgment entered when the plaintiffs declined to amend, upon the sustaining' of demurrers to their second complaint. The appellants seek a $2,000 judgment against the respondents Sparber and Ward for claimed negligence in the handling of a real estate transaction, and against the respondent Globe Indemnity Company as surety on the real estate broker’s bond of Sparber.

The appellants owned property in Oakland, and Sylvester Bowen and Ida Bowen owned property in Kings County, California. Sparber was a licensed real estate broker in Oakland and Ward a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Hogberg v. LandfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Dodge v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Haswell v. CostellenosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Baldwin v. Seeley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API