Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Village of Brandon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the County Court of Fond du Lae County.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Motion to dismiss the appeal. The action was brought to recover for the plaintiffs’ services as *499attorneys in several prosecutions for violations of the' excise laws within the defendant village, and also in an action brought by one "Whitton against the defendant, and for certain expenditures in all of said actions.

The original complaint was superseded by an amended complaint, which discloses the above causes of action. A demurrer to the amended complaint Avas sustained by the court, Avith leave to the plaintiffs to amend the same on payment of $10. The record does not contain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Moritz v. SplittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Armstrong v. GibsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Supervisors of Douglas County v. WalbridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Tronson v. Union Lumbering Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hooker v. Village of BrandonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bonnell v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Oconto Land Co. v. MoslingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Schlecht v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Lundin v. Ætna Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API