Legal Opinion

Schlecht v. Anderson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

This action was begun by the service of a summons and complaint on April 24, 1928. On the 24th day of May, 1928, the defendant Lew Anderson demurred to the plaintiffs’ complaint upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained by order of the court dated July 19, 1928. On July 24, 1928, an amended complaint was served. To the amended complaiijt the defendants Lew Anderson, Arthur J. Hanson, and R. B. Woodward separately demurred, first, upon the ground that the amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCargo v. . JergensNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. McCarville v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Robinson v. L'EngleSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
  4. State ex rel. Town of Star Prairie v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Brodie v. ClatorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. GoodmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Schlecht v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Seideman v. Sheboygan Loan & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Medved v. BairdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Peterson v. KemlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API