Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Termain
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 20, 2004No. 52967-6-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
103 P.3d 209 (2004)
CITY OF SEATTLE, Appellant,
v.
Kyla TERMAIN, Respondent.
No. 52967-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
December 20, 2004.
James Kevin Kenny, City of Seattle/Public & Comm. Safety Div., Seattle, for Appellant.
Christine Anne Jackson, Seattle, for Respondent.
GROSSE, J.
A charging document alleging a violation of a domestic violence order must identify the order the defendant is alleged to have violated, or at least include sufficient facts to apprise the defendant of his or her actions giving rise to the charge(s). Here, the challenged complaint merely tracks the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Bothell v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- City of Bothell v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State Of Washington v. Andrea Lynn ListerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. B. J. N.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Eric Charles MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.