Legal Opinion
Bell v. State
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
This current appeal from an order involving an almost 30-*812year-old unpaid law school loan is “frivolous” within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (a) and (c). The appeal is “completely without merit in law” and “cannot be supported by a[ny] reasonable argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law” as no constitutional question, let alone a substantial one, is directly involved in the order appealed (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [1]). The appeal is one in a chain of frivolous attempts to seek relief from this Court and is yet another example of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Maroulis v. 64th Street-Third Avenue AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation v. CarvelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bell v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Drummond v. DrummondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. LeTennierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- Divito v. FiandachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.