Maroulis v. 64th Street-Third Avenue Associates
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Cross motion for sanctions granted and sanctions in the amount of $2,500 imposed upon David Berg, Esq. This current motion for leave to appeal from a nonfinal order in this action involving an accounting for a partnership dissolved in 1975 is frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (a) and (c). No reasonable argument can be made that the current motion is within the jurisdiction of this Court.…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Jemzura v. MugglinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Jason v. ChusidNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Weissman v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Bell v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Carlson v. ColangeloNew York Court of Appeals · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.