Legal Opinion

Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cross motion for imposition of sanctions granted (see, 22 NYCRR part 130). This is the fifth motion in a chain reflecting a strategy of dilatory, frivolous avoidance of a 20-year-old student loan debt for two years’ law school education. The abuse of the judicial process and the imposition on opposition parties, aggravated by movant’s failure to pay usual motion costs imposed by this Court on previous applications to this…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Levy v. Carol Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Jemzura v. MugglinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Jason v. ChusidNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Feldstein v. New York City Department of Consumer AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  5. Bell v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API