Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. Kaune

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1963No. 7077PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAVEZ, Justice.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment in which the trial court entered an order and judgment dismissing the action, because it construed the action to be one for specific performance of an oral contract involving an interest in land and thus barfed by the statute of frauds. No evidence ■ was presented- other than the exhibits attached' to the complaint. No. findings of fact were made. For the purpose of this appeal, we take the allegations of the complaint as being true.

Appellant alleged that he entered into an oral agreement in 1922 with Henry E. Kaune, now deceased,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. HumphreysNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pederson v. LothmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Paulos v. JanetakosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re McGee's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Otero v. DietzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Harvey E. Yates Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Cooper v. CurryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Till v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API