Legal Opinion

(PC) Hamilton v. Ables

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 18, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00050Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID HAMILTON, No. 2:23-cv-0050 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 L. ABLES et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants used excessive force against him in violation of his 19 Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma 20 pauperis (ECF No. 2.) and his amended complaint1 (ECF No. 5) for screening. For the reasons 21 set forth below,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API