Legal Opinion

Port Authority v. Local 85, Amalgamated Transit Union

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1993No. 55 W.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

In this case, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (“PAT”) was ordered by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County to bargain collectively with their first level supervisors through the supervisors’ authorized bargaining agent, Appellee — Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union (“Union”). The Commonwealth Court affirmed, 566 A.2d 653, and we granted review. The underlying facts are as follows.

Appellant, PAT, was created pursuant to the Second Class Port Authority Act of April 6, 1956, P.L. (1955) 1414, 55 P.S. § 551, et seq. In 1968, this Court,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. Alcoa Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Port Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Division 85Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Port Authority v. Local 85, Amalgamated Transit UnionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Malloy v. Boyertown Area School BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Frasconi v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API