Port Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Division 85
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment entered in the court below.
The Port Authority of Allegheny County1 [hereinafter Authority] operates mass transit facilities in the City of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County and employs, inter alia, 120 individuals in the position of dispatchers, inspectors, district inspectors and instructors [hereinafter Supervisory Personnel]. The Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Division 85 [hereinafter Union] is the accredited bargaining representative of the employees of Authority. A dispute arose between Authority and Union as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Mohney EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Wirkman v. Wirkman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Holt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hunter v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- City of Cabool v. Missouri State Board of MediationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. S. G. S. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Port Authority v. Local 85, Amalgamated Transit UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.