Legal Opinion

Marriage of Burr v. Burr

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1984No. C0-84-220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Frederick J. Burr appeals from the trial court order denying a reduction in “family support” following the remarriage of his ex-wife, arguing that his ex-wife’s remarriage terminates his obligation to pay her spousal maintenance. Respondent, Patricia A. Burr, claims that the divorce decree, entered upon the parties’ stipulation, specifically provides that spousal maintenance shall continue until she reaches age 62 or Frederick Burr retires at age 62. We affirm.

FACTS

Frederick and Patricia Burr were divorced in 1983 after 16 years of marriage. The mother has custody of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Claybaugh v. ClaybaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Marriage of Powell v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Gunderson v. GundersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Marquardt v. Marquardt by RempferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Marquardt v. Marquardt by RempferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API