State v. Stanley
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, J.:
After comparing the Missouri and Kansas statutes prohibiting driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence, we have concluded that it is possible that the defendant here, Justin D. Stanley, could have been convicted in Missouri for conduct that would not lead to a conviction for driving under the influence in Kansas. Therefore, Stanleys prior Missouri conviction does not qualify as a prior conviction under K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 8-1567(i), and we vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.
This is strictly a sentencing question. The State charged Stanley with felony driving…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. RainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State v. TeasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.