Legal Opinion

State v. Lamone

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 9, 2017No. 115451Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 115,451 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. STEPHANIE R. LAMONE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law over which appellate courts have unlimited review. 2. Other than the fact of a previous conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, under the United States Constitution, only a jury, and not a court, may find facts that increase a maximum penalty. 3. The definition of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. State v. DickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API