Legal Opinion
Luskin v. Seoane
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends *1145that the order on appeal should he reversed insofar as it denied his motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the sixth cause of action of the complaint, which seeks damiages for breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty owed by defendant as an employee of plaintiff. We agree (see, Lamdin v Broadway Surface Adv. Corp., 272 NY 133, 138; see also, Feiger v Iral Jewelry, 41 NY2d 928; Henderson v Rep Tech, 162 AD2d 1028). Based upon her criminal conviction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Kramer v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Henderson v. Rep Tech, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cameco, Inc. v. GedickeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Aramony v. United Way of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Astra USA, Inc. v. BildmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- City of Binghamton v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- William Floyd Union Free School District v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009